| View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Treadmore New Member

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AndyJ Sage


Joined: 29 Jan 2010 Posts: 397
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think this was Gilham v R [2009] EWCA Crim 2293 (09 November 2009). The system won't allow me to post a link here because I'm a newbie, so I'll try and pm you the link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Treadmore New Member

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Treadmore New Member

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yep, last para refers to my question - thanks again.
On another point, ianal but that analysis regarding the mod chip by the judge seems to me to be plain wrong  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|